Friday, February 12, 2010

What Kate Does: Get Down with "the Sickness"

I had hoped to write a full-blown post discussing "the Sickness"--what we already knew and what we learned in the latest episode. Anyhow, it's not going to happen, so instead I'll jot a few ideas/thoughts here and look for some insight in the comments.

Briefly what we know:

-We first heard about the Sickness from Danielle Rousseau way back in Season 1 when Sayid first finds here in 1.09 "Solitary." We find that Rousseau was essentially telling the truth, when we are shown her story in 5.05 "This Place is Death." Rousseau's team is attacked by the Smoke Monster, Montand loses his arm and is dragged down under the Temple walls, and the rest of the team (minus Rousseau) goes under to retrieve him. Then, about one month later, we see that Rousseau has killed the rest of her team. Her husband, Robert, begs for his life under gunpoint; but when Rousseau appears to relent, he quickly raises his own gun and tries to murder his pregnant wife. The gun lacks a firing pin though, and Rousseau shoots and kills him. While we still don't know a great deal about the effects of the sickness, Robert's actions at least give us some clue that the sickness is real: by all appearances, Robert did seem "changed" or "infected" and, for whatever reason, he was motivated to try to kill his uninfected, pregnant wife.

-Dharma and the Others also perform actions which might have been intended to ward off the sickness. Recall that Desmond consistently took a vaccination while living in the Swan hatch. It is possible that this vaccination is tied to the sickness, although this should be called into question considering the fact that Dharma may have simply been using the "Quarantine" threat and vaccinations as a means of scaring the button-pressing teams to prevent their leaving the hatch. Additionally, recall that Ethan was intent on giving Claire shots (2.15 "Maternity Leave") to prevent her baby from getting sick. However, it is most likely that these shots were related to Juliet's attempt to stop pregnant women from dying on the Island and not related to the sickness.

Claire and Sayid -- We've been told (and will assume that) both Claire and Sayid have been infected. If we compare their cases, I think we can now assume that Claire, like Sayid, died and then was reanimated ("claimed"). Before I examine her case, let's quickly run through what I believe happened to Sayid:

-Sayid was shot and mortally wounded. Jacob, as a ghost, told Hurley to take him to the Temple as a last-ditch effort to save his life. Within the Temple is a life-saving spring, which I think we can safely assume was the means used by Richard to save young Ben's life in 5.12 "Dead is Dead." However, the springwater was no longer clear (likely implying a relation between the springwater's power and Jacob) and the water failed to save Sayid (note that the water failed also to heal Dogen's hand when he tested it). Sayid died and was only reanimated by being "claimed". In "What Kate Does," we find that the Others determined that Sayid was infected with the sickness, or as the Others called it, he had been "claimed." Over time, everything that Sayid once was will be changed.

-Claire, I believe, also died and was also "claimed." Recall that in 4.09 "The Shape of Things to Come," Widmore's mercenaries explode Claire's house. Sawyer apparently saves her from the wreckage, picking her up as she says, "Charlie?" in a daze. After the attack, Sawyer, Claire (with Aaron), and Miles head back to the beach. Miles, who we know can communicate with the dead, takes an unusual amount of interest in Claire, causing Sawyer to angrily put a restraining order on Miles. That night, Christian Shepherd (Claire and Jack's father) appears to Claire and leads her away causing her to desert Aaron (4.10 "Something Nice Back Home"). Finally, in 4.11 "Cabin Fever," Locke finds Claire with Christian Shepherd in Jacob's cabin. She acts in a very strange manner, showing no concern about having left Aaron out in the jungle, which is perhaps a sign of the initial changes caused by the sickness.

Now, in "LA X" there is a subtle, but important, scene in which Miles gives the recently dead body of Sayid a strange look. This look seemed to suggest that something was unusual with Sayid--that his body was not like those dead bodies that Miles normally encounters. Perhaps those that are "claimed" do not "talk" with Miles like a normal dead person does? Whatever it is exactly, the look was very similar to the way that Miles took interest in (I argue, the recently dead) Claire. So I believe that Claire underwent the same process as Sayid: she died in the attack and was quickly reanimated ("claimed").

Last thoughts:

1) Why didn't the Others just kill Sayid themselves once they found he was "claimed"? I think it's because Sayid was already dead, and so perhaps the poison pill, taken willingly, is the only means of "killing" a "claimed" person that has previously died. Contrast this with Rousseau's sick husband, who she was able to simply kill with a gun. My thought is that perhaps there are two ways to get the sickness: a) while alive, like Rousseau's team, and b) by being "claimed" when dead like Sayid and Claire. I assume we'll find out more soon.

2) Who is doing the "claiming?" The Others don't specially say, but I think it's fairly obvious that it is the Man in Black (fake Locke). Rousseau's team contracted the sickness after encountering the Smoke Monster and following it under the Temple. Christian Shepherd came to take Claire, and we've long suspected that he might have a connection to the MIB. Finally, it would make sense that the Others, followers of Jacob, would fear those "claimed" by Jacob's enemy. Also kind of cool, note that Jacob's symbol--the statue, Tawaret--is the goddess of birth, while the Smoke Monster's symbol Anubis is the god of the underworld. It would make sense that Jacob would claim the living, while MIB would claim the dead.

11 comments:

  1. Good post. Here is my question about the healing waters. Jacob convinces Hurley to bring Sayid to the Temple, likely hoping that he would be dipped in the magic waters and healed. But Jacob was dead at this time. Did he not know that he had some connection to the waters? Did he not know that the waters wouldn't heal now that that that connection was broken? It just seems a little odd to me. As Ben said, "I doubt Jacob was ever confused." He had to know that something had changed. Yet he still wanted Sayid taken to the Temple. That is the confusing part I have found about the whole MIB v. Jacob via "the sickness".

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that Jacob still remains a mystery in many regards: Who is he? How much does he know? How extensive are his powers? Is he truly "good" (although I really believe that "good" is a relative term on LOST)?

    With that said, I think it makes the most sense to think that Jacob was hoping that there would be enough healing power left in the water to save Sayid. I think it was a last-ditch effort, knowing that should Sayid die, he would most probably be claimed by the MIB (btw, I don't think the failed attempt in the dirty water had anything to do with Sayid's being claimed...I think it would have happened regardless of where he died). Again, we have the living vs. the dead symbolism. So long as he remained alive, Sayid could serve Jacob's plan...but once he died, the MIB could claim him.

    With that said, I don't think the MIB is limited to only the dead. I expect that living characters will be given the choice to serve him rather than Jacob (much like MIB used the living Ben to further his wishes).

    But there's still alot of guesswork at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it's important that we also keep an open mind about Jacob and the MIB. We don't really know yet who is the "good guy" and who is the "bad guy" (yes, I know this is all relative, they are probably both gray). Jacob must have known the water was murky and his motivations for having Sayid dipped in the water may not have been noble ones - maybe he wanted Sayid to be claimed?

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's an answer I will be interested to see. Was the cause of Sayid's sickness due to the dark water or was it as Skoks said, just a product of his death and that the water was a last ditch effort to keep him from the sickness. I'm not convinced either way yet, so hopefully we get some more on this soon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Of course I'm not positive, but my guess would be that the murky water was not the cause of the sickness. The murkiness only meant that the healing powers of the water were lost. My reasoning is 1) neither Claire nor Rousseau's team went near the Temple spring (and the spring would have been clear then anyhow) and yet they got the sickness--if we assume it's the same sickness, then it seems odd that they would have gotten it in a different way than Sayid; 2) I doubt Jacob would have risked putting Sayid in the spring if he knew there was some possibility that it could backfire and cause the very thing I argue Jacob was trying to avoid--I think the whole point of the Temple spring-rescue trip was to stop Sayid from being "claimed"; and 3) I don't think that Jacob wanted Sayid to be "claimed" because his followers, The Others, appeared so anti-"claiming"/anti-sickness--unless The Others are completely lying (which at this point in Season 6, I doubt the writers would waste too much time on misdirection anymore) or aren't really following Jacob, then I have to take their reaction as "claiming" = bad for Jacob.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm rewatching "What Kate Does" and I think the first sign that Sayid was not himself was the way he reacted to Dogen's torture. I don't remember the scenes exactly but Sayid was electrocuted by Rousseau, no? I don't remember him crying like a baby. And when he was held captive in Paris I don't remember his crying. Yet he gets a little shock and burned by a poker and he loses all pain threshold. I don't like the new sissy Sayid.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So I wasn't sure exactly where to post this but I figured as a comment to the latest post would work.

    After a second viewing of "What Kate Does," I don't dislike it as much anymore. I think it really was a function of wanting answers and not getting them. In retrospect though, as an episode, it was really good. There were two particular things that stuck out to me the second time through. The first is the importance of our Losties. I'm still not sure why they were brought to island but whatever the reason it is clearly important. Dogen tells Sawyer that he "must stay." Then Lennon tells Kate that it is very important that he is brought back safely. Finally at the end of the episode when Aldo is talking about shooting Jin, Justin says, "Aldo no, he's one of them." Aldo responds "maybe he is and maybe he isn't." Being "one of them" is clearly important to the end game, whatever that may be.

    Second, the scene with Sawyer and Kate on dock was particularly interesting. I don't know if I didn't pick it up the first time around, but I thought Sawyer's rejection of Kate was pretty complete. She thought she would show up and her and Sawyer would team up, find Claire, and live happily every after. Sawyer responds that "you can probably make it back to the Temple by nightfall." I enjoyed the scene not for the fact that Kate broke down crying but at how much Sawyer really cares about Juliet. I'm not sure that I ever bought the Sawyer/Kate relationship. It was one of convenience. Both loners who are always on the move. But Sawyer and Juliet's relationship was real and I think that resonated with the audience. For half a second on the dock I was afraid that Sawyer and Kate were going to kiss, but Sawyer really redeemed my faith in him. He really loved Juliet, probably the first time in his life that he ever truly loved someone. After watching some Season 1 episodes, Josh Holloway is a completely different actor. I'm really looking forward to a Sawyer centric episode in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good thoughts. I was really surprised at the absolute hate for this episode (second lowest rated over at DarkUfo, better only than "Stranger in a Strange Land"). It wasn't my favorite episode, but it did give us some good scenes (Kate & Sawyer on the dock, Jack & Dogen discussing Sayid) and some stuff to chew on (the Sickness, "claiming", the return of Claire, alternate universe continuing to mirror the original).

    Also, I agree that it seemed to put an end to the Sawyer/Kate possibilities. Whether or not you liked Sawyer/Juliet, thank god they decided to not completely trash it and have Sawyer bounce right back to Kate. Sawyer/Juliet was tough for the audience to swallow, largely because we didn't get to see it develop over the three years in Dharmaville. Sawyer's reaction on the dock was solid though. I definitely agree with really enjoying Holloway's work, and I'm very excited to see him team up with Terry O'Quinn (as MIB) next episode. One of my favorite series of scenes occurred during 3.19 "The Brig," in which Locke leads Sawyer to the Black Rock to try to get Sawyer to kill Anthony Cooper (Locke's father and the real Sawyer). The tension during the scene where Sawyer realizes that he's locked in the same room as the man who destroyed his life is unreal. And I thought the acting was outstanding.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I also thought Sayid was acting like a huge sissy when they were torturing him! It was definitely not Sayid-like at all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Skoks,

    I've been reading some grumblings about the date on Claire's sonogram. The date is apparently October 22, 2004, a full month after the original flight 815. While it may be just a mistake (there are few production mistakes in Lost) there has been a lot of speculation that it actually is a month later than the original timeline's flight. Claire was on the island for about a month before Aaron was born, but in the ATL the baby is about to be born. There was also speculation that maybe Locke did indeed go on his walkabout, like he said, which would have taken a month, and now here we are. I haven't thought too deeply about it but was interested in your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah, I've heard those grumblings too. I'm leaning strongly towards it just being a mistake, simply because I can't imagine how a month difference between the Alt and Original could be significant. I mean, if the writers wanted us to notice a difference, wouldn't they have made it more than only a month? Also, remember that Claire had false-labor contractions twice before she actually gave birth to Aaron in 1.20 "Do No Harm." She had contractions immediately after the crash in the "Pilot" (when Jack ran over to her on the beach) and then again right before Ethan kidnapped her and Charlie in 1.10 "Raised by Another." So, the contractions/false-labor in the Alt alone doesn't necessarily mean it's a month later. Finally, some people have suggested that the sonogram was actually showing Claire's due-date which would have been sometime in October, so perhaps that's a clever little way of explaining the "mistake." In the end, I think the sonogram was more important in confirming that the Alt was taking place in 2004 (and not 2007, like some people had wondered).

    As for Locke, I'm not really sure if he actually went on the walkabout this time, but my guess is that he still didn't. I think he was simply lying out of embarassment to Boone, and the lie was meant to make the audience wonder for a bit whether Locke is able to walk in the Alt. It wasn't until a few scenes later when the plane lands that we finally see that Locke is still paralyzed.

    ReplyDelete